RE: Status of mail list ...

From: Kostas Anagnostakis <>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 20:51:05 -0700 (MST)

Hi Barry,

On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote:

> Hello Kostas,
> Any pointers to the MIB? I would like to start meshing our work with your
> work. There will be product specific areas, but working towards typical
> things every cache will need to support is something we need to get started.
> Otherwise, people are going to drift off in separate directions.

The latest (well, actually the latest _working_ one ;) ) is available at

I'm currently reviewing both structure and individual fields, so waiting
until next week would probably save you some frustration over the current
design. Also, cacheAccounting group is being defined.

I agree with you on the separation of product specific data. Our first
impressions of _using_ the current experimental mib will hopefully be
helpful in weeding out unnecessary variables etc.

I'm actually pretty much concerned on whether there can be a generic
"cacheProtoStats", to accomodate vital per-protocol counters. ICP, HTTP
and all client<->cache protocols can be easily accomodated. I'm not
sure about CARP , WCCP etc. Any clue?

Received on Mon Mar 16 1998 - 19:51:18 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:22:04 MST