map@iphil.net writes:
>Hi,
>
>First of all thanks for posting the transcript - I can only imagine
>how the virtual meeting takes place! :)
>
>> The only thing that is a bit unclear is if objects are stale even if the
>> PUT request fails.
>
>It would seem that PUT requests should be stale at all times since there
>is no reason to cache outgoing data. Another reason that would back this up
>is my observation (is it true for everyone else?) that outgoing bandwidth
>is much, much more plentiful than incoming.
What Henrik (and the RFC) means is this:
A GET http://foo.org/ occurs and is successful, so it gets
cached. A PUT http://foo.org/ occurs and is not cachable. At
the same time the previous 'GET http://foo.org/' must now be
marked STALE.
Duane W.
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:40 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:14 MST