On Fri, Nov 27, 1998 at 05:27:46PM +0900, Ryu Cheol wrote:
> If Cisco would not open WCCP, another one should be made with
> other router/switch vendors? or just policy routing command enough?
To date, policy routing has been sufficient. I'm not sure what
technical advantages WCCP offers -- but it is a hell of a lot easier
to configure on a router/NAS:
ip wccp enable
int eth0 ! or whatever
ip web-cache redirect
The the configuration of all the rest is done from the cache
engine(s) which is a nice idea.
I assume this version of WCCP is a `new and improved' version as the
last one has been reverse engineered and apparently leave much to be
desired...
The nice thing about WCCP though is that the `failure mode' is more
pleasant than with a policy route/route-map.
-cw
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:54 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:58 MST