Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
>
> > Can't we just expand on the diskd concept?
> > Idea: the parent process forks one diskd for each storage, and
> > passes shmem IDs to all children. Then accesses are done
> > through this helper processes farm.
>
> Look back in the squid-dev archives. Something similar to this has been
> proposed before when discussing multithreading, multiprocesses, and
> other approaches to getting Squid running in SMP environments.
Some references to earlier threads where this has been discussed:
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200003/index.html#12
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200006/index.html#52
/Henrik
Received on Tue Oct 17 2000 - 09:11:54 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:50 MST