RE: Patch: splay-tree-based version of the proxy_auth ACL

> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> > Right. So the NTLM branch cannot be considered a merge
> candidate unless
> > that code also is.
> >
> > All I intended to say was that WHEN we decide that NTLM
> should be merged
> > then the code is ready to be merged without porting. I did
> not intend to
> > indicate that NTLM should be merged now.
>
> Thats what I thought, I never thought you said NTLM should be merged
> now. :-)

I stand my idea that 2.5 should follow 2.4 very closely (1-2 months at most)
and only add NTLM.
Received on Wed Oct 18 2000 - 01:36:30 MDT