Re: 2.4DEVEL -> 2.4STABLE?

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:36:52 +0800

On Wed, Oct 18, 2000, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> > Ok,
> >
> > What needs to be done in 2.4 to make it ready for a STABLE branch?
> > I have:
> >
> > * fix doublecheck
> > * fix shutdown so it happens cleanly
> >
> > What else needs to be done ?
>
> aufs needs to get stable and perform reasonably well. Currently working
> on this. See the asyncio branch on sourceforge if you are to touch
> anything more in aufs. (wuite extensive rewrite, so any changes in the
> HEAD version of aufs will quite likely cause conflicts here..)
>
> Btw, good work with the memory pools. Continued it a fair bit further in
> the above branch by adding a even smaller pool (128 bytes), and allocate
> all paths using your pooled xmalloc primitive.

.. even thought it was all Andres' work and I just tidied up the stuff
which touched aufs.

Anything else besides that?

-- 
Adrian Chadd			"It was then that I knew that I wouldn't
<adrian@creative.net.au>	    die, as a doctor wouldn't fart in front
				      of a dying boy." -- Angela's Ashes
Received on Thu Oct 19 2000 - 00:37:01 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:51 MST