Re: seen_offset vs copy_offset

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:58:02 +0100

Adrian Chadd wrote:

> Right. Well, I'd like to totally kill seen_offset - from what I've seen,
> I can simply "optimise" out seen_offset by tracking the buffer offset
> and size rather than calling storeClientCopy with the same copy_offset
> but increasing seen_offset.

If you don't kill the header parsing you most likely cannot kill
seen_offset. It will still be needed one way or another to defer
processing until the required data is available.

/Henrik
Received on Tue Dec 26 2000 - 17:14:25 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:06 MST