Re: storeGet() -> storeGetPublic() ?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 00:28:07 +0100

Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Cool.
> To check I understand -> the patches from storeGet-storeGetPublic
> are interim until someone goes through those calling functions and
> gets them to use storeLookup?

My understanding is that is is cleanups of old code found when
investigatin how to implement storeLookup.

/Henrik
Received on Sat Jan 06 2001 - 16:26:30 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Robert Collins: "Re: storeGet() -> storeGetPublic() ?"
Previous message: Robert Collins: "Re: storeGet() -> storeGetPublic() ?"
In reply to: Robert Collins: "Re: storeGet() -> storeGetPublic() ?"
Next in thread: Robert Collins: "Re: storeGet() -> storeGetPublic() ?"
Reply: Robert Collins: "Re: storeGet() -> storeGetPublic() ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:11 MST