Re: commloops

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 12:20:52 +0100

Adrian Chadd wrote:

> The trouble with commloops is that I need to find a clean way to
> destroy deferred reads so the codebase becomes event-IO friendly.
> Otherwise we end up with the same problems as I had with
> kqueue and devpoll where the deferred reads started to lock the
> CPU usage right up.

Ok. I'll try to come up with some design where it fits.

/Henrik
Received on Sun Jan 07 2001 - 04:22:01 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:12 MST