Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> > A better choice is perhaps to translate it to basic with a shared
> > secret password... this has the benefit that it is a known mechanism
> > which is well understood by servers.
>
> That might work. Maybe some magic in the cache_peer options (i.e.
> login=@USER@:sharedpassword)
what about login=*:password. Looks better I think ;-)
Implementing it should be pretty simple. One or two lines.
/Henrik
Received on Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:49:03 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:13 MST