Re: auth_rewrite authenticate.c user_auth_hash_pointer usage

From: Robert Collins <robert.collins@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:07:36 +1100

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
Cc: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: auth_rewrite authenticate.c user_auth_hash_pointer usage

> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > > The cross-over issue you already have to worry about, only at a slightly
> > > different place (auth_user, instead of auth_user->scheme).
> >
> > Uhh not the same issue:
> > currently acl.c requests a auth_user_request structure, and then passes that around the rest of squid. That points to a
auth_user
> > structure (1 per username per scheme). So we can't hop schemes.
>
> The cross-over issue is the same. The solution is different. Most likely
> the user_auth_request structure should have space for scheme specific
> information, especially considering that the user is not known until the
> scheme tells who it is.

It does :]. What it doesn't have at the moment, because it is redundant, is a scheme identifier.
Received on Sat Jan 13 2001 - 19:55:59 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:18 MST