Re: [SQU] Squid 2.4 Head FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:14:33 +0100

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> Hmm... "swap_dirn = -1"... oops. the code forgot to handle concurrent
> requests while rebuilding the cache.

The sad thing is that this is most likely a DIFFERENT problem than your
first problem report..

/Henrik
Received on Mon Feb 19 2001 - 16:13:26 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [SQU] Squid 2.4 Head FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: further to store & message flow discussion"
In reply to: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [SQU] Squid 2.4 Head FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying"
Next in thread: Alejandro A. Ramirez: "Re: [SQU] Squid 2.4 Head FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:33 MST