> > I tagged this version and put it on the http/ftp servers.
> 
> Just had a look at it - at the least, class 3 delay pools are broken, and the 
> patch in bugzilla is not sufficient to fix them.  The original algorithm 
> should have worked, why was it changed?
> 
> The patch in bugzilla may fix most of the breakage but it won't fix network 
> #255.  I know the original code depended on obscure side-effects, but these
> could have been documented in comments.
> 
> I'll try and come up with a patch.
Actually class 2 are also broken and will cause an assertion failure if host 
255 is used, since the type has been changed from an unsigned char to an 
unsigned int, so 255 + 1 = 256 not 0.  Apart from that, 255 looks like the
original code.
David.
-- David Luyer Phone: +61 3 9674 7525 Engineering Projects Manager P A C I F I C Fax: +61 3 9699 8693 Pacific Internet (Australia) I N T E R N E T Mobile: +61 4 1111 2983 http://www.pacific.net.au/ NASDAQ: PCNTFReceived on Mon Mar 05 2001 - 18:20:46 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:36 MST