Re: src/fs/coss/store_dir_coss.c

From: Robert Collins <robert.collins@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 08:44:04 +1000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: "Andres Kroonmaa" <andre@online.ee>
Cc: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: src/fs/coss/store_dir_coss.c

> On Fri, May 04, 2001, Andres Kroonmaa wrote:
> > On 4 May 2001, at 22:55, Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 04, 2001, Andres Kroonmaa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > While fixing src to use new style memPoolDestroy() I came
across
> > > > that coss_index_pool is not destroyed.
> > > > I hope somebody familiar with COSS would say if its right.
> > >
> > > Oh? Hrm. ok. Do it. :-)
> >
> > On the other note, to see how memPoolDestroy() works I put a
breakpoint
> > on it, and I can't get it triggered. Is any pool actually ever
destroyed
> > in squid? When?
>
> I don't think so. Tried squid -k shutdown'ing ?
> It will be important when we start allowing dynamic modules to be
> linked in..

memCleanModule calls the memPool cleanup function. I had a module
cleaning itself up on shutdown, before memCleanModule occured, and got
squid to segsigv. (See my 2 minute ago message :] )

Rob

>
> Adrian
>
>
> --
> Adrian Chadd "How could we possibly use sex to get
> <adrian@creative.net.au> what we want?
> Sex _IS_ what we want!" -- Fraser
>
Received on Fri May 04 2001 - 16:46:51 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:59 MST