Re: Multiple request blocking

From: Adrian Chadd <>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:07:32 +0800

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001, Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> > cachable (current
> > > model)
> > > c) Never
> We could just have later requests wait until enough is known
> (which maybe is what we're doing now). I agree with Andres
> that joining without knowledge is a Bad Thing(tm).
> Or, we could introduce something like CPU pipelining.
> We optimistically join, but as soon as we can determine whether
> the request can be shared (i.e. after getting HTTP headers from
> the origin) we add an extra check and if it can't share we
> un-join and start a new request.

..if you've started sending data to the second client.. :)


Adrian Chadd			Yeah, for me its (XML) like the movie Titanic.
<>	  Everybody loves it.
				    I want to be different, so I hate it.
					--Duane Wessels
Received on Fri Jul 06 2001 - 09:07:38 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:06 MST