On 3 Apr 2002, at 0:38, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2002 00:16, Andres Kroonmaa wrote:
>
> > > http://devel.squid-cache.org/projects.html#cf_preprocess
> >
> > Cute. case closed?
>
> I don't know. It is just one small proposal on how to deal with it.
>
> Which one do you prefer for your use?
Suits me well. Given more potential, good to have.
I'm only worried about one more needed fork of 500M process,
and that its not "native". More of a psychological barrier.
> a) Simple include capability in Squid
>
> b) Simple integration any pre-processor to deal with includes and
> potentioally other complex problems, but at the cost of less precise
> error handling as the two isn't integrated.
>
> It should also be noted that one does not technically exclude the
> other, but it seems wasteful to have support for both methods..
------------------------------------
Andres Kroonmaa <andre@online.ee>
CTO, Microlink Online
Tel: 6501 731, Fax: 6501 725
Pärnu mnt. 158, Tallinn,
11317 Estonia
Received on Tue Apr 02 2002 - 16:17:58 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:56 MST