Re: A proposal for the improvement of the delay pools

From: Henrik Nordstrom <>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:06:12 +0200

Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> The "matrix" view seems more natural to me, but I'd like to hear
> more opinions of course. It is also arguably more expensive
> in terms of performance cost, since all definition ACLs have to
> be evaluated at connection setup time.

I don't agree that a matrix configuration needs to be expensive, only


delay_class <name> <parameters>
delay_pool add <name>[,<name>...] [<acl...>]
delay_pool set <name>[,<name>...] [<acl...>]
delay_pool set none [<acl...>]

Received on Mon Apr 15 2002 - 08:06:28 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:15:10 MST