Re: devel platforms without autoconf 2.53

I won't argue with it.

Robert Collins wrote:
> Who here is using a development platform that does not have *easy*
> access to autoconf 2.53?
>
> I'm asking because it would be nice to fully flush the autoconf-25
> branch to HEAD, but only if it won't cause trouble for anyone.
>
> For distributors I don't see this causing any difficulty, because squid
> would not be the first package that requires autoconf 2.53, thus they
> already have the infrastructure in place.
>
> For end users building from source but not hacking, this doesn't affect
> them due to the use of AM_MAINTAINER_MODE.

-- 
Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
Web caching appliances and support.
http://www.swelltech.com