Re: store MD5 keys

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:06:17 +0200

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 19:18, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > It is true that we need to unify HEAD and GET, but removing the request
> > method won't solve the problem, only give you a whole bunch of other
> > problems.
> >
> > There is more to this than variants and ETag. You also have to consider
> > error messages and negative caching.
>
> Sure. I did not mean that we stop considering the method, just that it
> should not be part of the store key lookup process.

Then please explain again how you envision that to work in the current store
model? Taking non-GET/HEAD methods and negative caching of these into the
equation..

Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Sep 09 2002 - 06:06:20 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:30 MST