Robert Collins wrote:
> > My current position is is pretty neutral. To me at this moment it is
> > mostly a question on release maintenance. I do not see C++ as an option
> > during Squid-2.X. But if we are prepared to jump to Squid-3 then sure,
> > why not.
>
> So what you are saying, is when we have a patch for C++ across the
> board, we call the next release 3.0?
You can put it that way if you like, but I prefer to view it the other way. If
we are prepared to start development of release 3.0 then I have no problem
with using C++ in this development, using a model of gradual transition and
refactoring of the current code.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Oct 08 2002 - 08:23:41 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:54 MST