Re: rproxy merges?

On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 10:55, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> fre 2003-02-21 klockan 22.30 skrev Robert Collins:
>
> > > - a second http_access directive after redirection (http_access2 in
> > > lack of a better name)
> >
> > What about redirected_http_access ?
>
> Not bad.
>
> or perhaps http_access_redirected to make it closer to http_access?

we've got a common convention of ..._access for access lists. I think
that keeping that would make sense.

> but on the other hand the rproxy branch also renames redirectors to url
> rewriting.. this to more accurately describe what it is doing, and works
> better in combination with location rewriting..

so, we have:
rewritten_http_access or
rewritten_url_access or
rewritten_request_access ?

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.