Re: Windows port merge - MS Visual C++ compatibility [PATCH 1]

On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 08:16, Serassio Guido wrote:
> Hi Robert,

> >
> >I'd rather keep the explicit initialisation rather than assignment to
> >NULL.
>
> Just made some try: the (*class) (NULL); syntax seems to works fine, so for
> me is OK.

Ok, I'll grep for and alter all instances of static construction to be
like that tonight - no need to send a patch (but you likely want to roll
back your patch to CVS).

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.