Re: squid-2.5 and coss

From: Robert Collins <robertc@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:52:30 +1000

On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 18:41, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> Well, it'd be _wonderful_ to have the storage interface reworked a little
> so instead of working with fixed-size buffers we pass them a store mem
> chain and say "do as much of this as you can and let me know..".
> Then, for example, COSS reads would become instantly more efficient.

Well, we don't have a 'chain' of store mem buffers anymore. It's now a
random access no-contiguous splay.

That forms the basis for range combining from upstream + store, and
other such funky things.

To separate out into hot cache and transit objects, refcounting is
needed, along with a separation between in-creation and created buffers.

Cheers,
Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.

Received on Wed Aug 27 2003 - 03:52:35 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:20:30 MST