Re: Why is no-cache ignored on pending objects?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 23:07:28 +0100 (CET)

On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Duane Wessels wrote:

> So the hack was put in place to accomodate this broken client
> (if it is the situation I am thinking of).

In any case it is gone now.

If such problem resurfaces it needs to be dealt with in some other manner.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Jan 02 2004 - 15:07:31 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Jan 31 2004 - 12:00:10 MST