Re: 2.5 and delay pools

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:54:22 +0100 (CET)

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> > More likely the way FD_SETSIZE is extended is broken for your libc
> > headers..
>
> I agree, but its becoming a pain to work around this.

Please verify the assert I sent. If it triggers we at least know this is
the problem.

Which libc are you using?

> > You need to remove far more fd_set references if this is the problem.
> > There is also seveal delay pool related fd_set usage in comm_poll, and a
> > few other places I think.
>
> Ok. I must've missed them. Let me go through the codebase and remove
> all references to fd_set when you're not actually using select().

I prefer to not touch the comm loop within the 2.5 cycle..

Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:54:24 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 12:00:04 MST