On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
> I've no idea about the same... that said, we could use the 'if its gcc
> 3.x it will be ok approach'. And yes, replacing our implementations with
> STL typedefs would be a reasonable approach to migrating/coexisting.
What would be the benefits of using STL if we still need to have the code
compatible with non-STL environments?
Regards
Henrik
Received on Sat Sep 04 2004 - 03:52:41 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Sep 30 2004 - 12:00:04 MDT