Re: Info on Bug #1154

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 00:27:00 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Robert Collins wrote:

> transparent has very specific meaning in rfc2616, I really don't think
> we should refer to transparent for anything other than that.

Agreed

Didn't I convince everyone to use interception the last time this came up?
Must have forgotten myself in that list of people to convince... ;-)

Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Feb 01 2005 - 16:27:03 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Feb 25 2005 - 12:00:03 MST