On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> Ah. Makes sense...seems mostly up to date although this morning when
> resyncing with cvs I noticed a change (U) to acl.c which according to
> viewcvs, hasn't been touched for years.
This is due to a "bad" commit message in revision 1.41 confusing cvsweb on
this file. There has been plenty of changes in acl.c as can be seen if you
use "cvs log -rSQUID_2_5 src/acl.c".
> I never got a commit message for Guido's changes you commented on
> either..
He wasn't subscribed to the squid-cvs mailinglist so his commit messages
were rejected..
> I'll attach a patch to the bugzilla entry which fixes a typo and IMHO
> makes the explanation slightly clearer..
Great!
Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Feb 15 2005 - 01:28:56 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Feb 25 2005 - 12:00:03 MST