Re: SqString

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:48:45 +0800

On Thu, May 24, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote:

> I still think SqString "API" changes should not be in 3.0, but I do not
> have a strong opinion and do not want to be the one backing them out.
>
> We could adopt a middle-ground solution. The changes limited to renaming
> String methods to match std::string API can stay. The changes
> introducing new operators, conversions, or methods should be postponed
> until v3.1. Same for changes in the code that uses Strings: renaming is
> fine, rearranging and optimizing things is not.

Sounds good. At least squid-3 isn't crashing here under local light
testing now (with SqString). I'm going to load up squid-3 under some
heavy live reverse proxy load this weekend ; I'll report how it behaves.

Adrian
Received on Thu May 24 2007 - 08:47:52 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 12:00:09 MDT