Re: epoll

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On ons, 2007-08-29 at 00:34 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> After todays changes I am now getting (with --enable-epoll)
>>
<snip>

> Right. Question is how many will need it..
>
> I think not, and have now killed the section which refers to the script.
>
> Builds using the (these days) undocumented --enable-epoll option without
> properly working epoll will now either fail or result in a non-working
> binary, just as is the case when enabling kqueue on a system not
> supporting kqueue..
>

I'm now getting compile problems.
Under the new state does USE_POLL or HAVE_POLL have preference over
runtime code? (src/structs.h:1567 versus src/stat.cc:993)

Both of those have come in from HEAD over the last two merges (in their
respective order). I patched earlier according to structs.h, but this
has made me think again.

Amos
Received on Fri Aug 31 2007 - 06:20:50 MDT