On Jan 7, 2008 8:09 PM, Tsantilas Christos
<chtsanti@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Gonzalo Arana wrote:
> >
> > CVS used only 4K, while bzr used more than 80M (it devastated my workstation).
> It was not so bad.... But in the other hand 80M are not huge amount in
> these days ......
Remember that some of us work at companies with small budgets :(.
Does this overhead in getting a working copy is shadowed by the
benefits of shifting
to bzr?
> > Since I am not a core squid developer, I know that I don't have a vote
> > on this, but
> > I have to say that I am quite disappointed with bzr resource usage.
> >
> Did you use the local bzr copy to create local branches, get diffs,
> etc? These thinks looks very useful .....
No, sory, I just stopped after bzr branch finished. As soon as I have some
spare time, I'll read bzr documentation a little further and give it a
try at home (with
more RAM).
Regards,
-- Gonzalo A. AranaReceived on Tue Jan 08 2008 - 07:32:40 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jan 30 2008 - 12:00:09 MST