Re: bugzilla weirdness

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:34:26 +0900

> The response when first accessing the bug (with no attachments).
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:08:21 GMT
> Server: Apache/2.2.6 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.6 OpenSSL/0.9.7e-p1 DAV/2
> PHP/5.2.5 with Suhosin-Patch
> Cache-Control: max-age=86400

That probably doesn't help.

> Expires: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:08:21 GMT

.. hm, and if I read that right, its not expiring immediately.

> Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100
> Connection: Keep-Alive
> Transfer-Encoding: chunked
> Content-Type: text/html

Tsk!

> The second response (when accessing the bug that has an attachment)

This is all very tsk-worthy too..

> wireshark showed that the second response do list the attachment, but
> Firefox did not show it.

Right.

> Seems that firefox shows an expired entity when it's age is less than 'max-age'.
>
> Am I right?

I think so. And caches won't revalidate it for a day.

Henrik?

Adrian
Received on Wed Jan 16 2008 - 19:24:55 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jan 30 2008 - 12:00:09 MST