Re: a simple formatter

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:48:05 +1300 (NZDT)

>
> On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 23:26 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
>> Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> >
>> > Changes in the current code are only bad for outstanding patches and
>> > forgotten branches, right? If everybody applies the same formatting to
>> > all their branches and HEAD, we should not have many conflicts, right?
>>
>> I don't know, possibly it is OK.
>> Or just format the HEAD, merge HEAD to branches (this will take some
>> hours but...) and then apply formating to the branch. After the first
>> time all will be OK.
>
> with CVS you will be much better off formatting all branches
> simultaneously, then merging.

I think that would cause clashes on any very old branches. They would need
merging up before the format then formatting HEAD & branches and
re-merging.

Amos
Received on Mon Feb 11 2008 - 14:48:08 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 12:00:09 MST