Re: TPROXY support in Squid 3

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tis 2008-04-08 klockan 01:16 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
>> In fact, there shouldn't be any LINUX_TPROXY* defines in the main codetree.
>> There should be a "SERVER_SPOOF" define which ties in all of the connection
>> tracking stuff, and a clean cut API for doing TPROXY2/TPROXY4/etc socket
>> manipulation.
>
> I say it shouldn't even be a SERVER_SPOOF define. Make the generic parts
> always compiled, doing nothing if spoofing capabilities is not
> available.

I'm agreeing with Henrik on this one. Transparent mode basics should be
always available.

But, baby steps people:
  - Get it in
  - Get it tested.
  - Polish into a class.

So far we are at #1

Amos

-- 
Please use Squid 2.6.STABLE19 or 3.0.STABLE4