On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> We have come up with a 'final-beta' patch for squid-3 now.
> http://treenet.co.nz/projects/squid/patches/tproxy-squid-3_20080407.patch
> Just waiting on Laszlo final approval.
>
> It's pretty much:
>
> * adding a COMM_TRANSPARENT flag to comm_openex(...)
This is the only thing I'm a bit weird on. This means that the same flag
to TPROXY is used for outgoing sockets and incoming sockets?
I'm thinking about seperating them just to make it absolutely clear -
it doesn't matter that the backend sends the same sockopt and calls the same
bind().
I don't think it matters in the FreeBSD case either as I'm pretty sure
the patch I have here uses the same flag for incoming and outgoing sockets.
What do you (and others) think?
Adrian
-- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -Received on Mon Apr 07 2008 - 23:13:28 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 12:00:07 MDT