Re: zph and squid-3.0

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 14:33:12 +1200 (NZST)

> I don't think the zph patch belongs in 3.0.STABLE. It's a new feature
> with several new directives, not a bugfix, and additionally I'd like a
> bit of cleanup before release.
>
> Saw that it got merged to 3.0 some day ago... and I vote that it gets
> backed out from 3.0. But should stay in trunk.

I added it as a simple cross-port. Seeing as it's been well tested as a
patch on 2.6. even if not integrated until recently.

The polish was going to go in 3.1 when I have time.

Any other votes for/against?

Amos
Received on Wed May 07 2008 - 02:33:16 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 13 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT