Re: Bug #1893; why's it incomplete?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:30:42 +0200

On ons, 2008-06-11 at 17:50 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> Are there any objections to removing this patch from Squid-2.HEAD and
> documenting this discussion (and other Vary related stuff) on a wiki page?

No problem.

> A Cacheboy tester has noted that there's a definite drop in hit rate between
> 2.6/2.7 and Cacheboy; the only thing I can really associate it with is this
> Vary stuff. (He's testing out this theory at the moment.)

Quite likely this. Given a little time it will make quite a lot of
content uncachable as more and more objects get stuck in the zombie
state created by the patch when a object transits from not having Vary
to having Vary in it's response headers...

Regards
Henrik

Received on Wed Jun 11 2008 - 10:30:48 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 11 2008 - 12:00:05 MDT