Re: Bug #1893; why's it incomplete?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:28:42 +1000

These issues may be relevant:
   http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/37
   http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/38

If I understand correctly, Henrik is talking about a case where these
two responses might be seen from an origin:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/foo
Cache-Control: max-age=30
Content-Encoding: gzip
Vary: Accept-Encoding

[ gzip'd content ]

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/foo
Cache-Control: max-age=30

[ plain content ]

On 12/06/2008, at 10:57 AM, Benno Rice wrote:

>
> On 11/06/2008, at 10:24 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>>> On ons, 2008-06-11 at 17:50 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are there any objections to removing this patch from Squid-2.HEAD
>>>> and
>>>> documenting this discussion (and other Vary related stuff) on a
>>>> wiki page?
>>>
>>> No problem.
>>
>> Ok. I'll commit a reversal of the patch later on.
>
> If someone can provide me with an example of a request/response
> pattern that provokes the incorrect behaviour, I'll happily try and
> fix the patch up.
>
> --
> Benno Rice
> benno_at_jeamland.net
>
>
>

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
Received on Thu Jun 12 2008 - 01:29:24 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 12 2008 - 12:00:05 MDT