Re: pseudo-specs for a String class

On ons, 2008-08-27 at 11:43 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:

> My vote is not to vote until it is clear what you are implementing.
>
> The original discussion was about meaningful strings and opaque buffers
> they will use. Then you said that you are not implementing a string,
> just a buffer. Right now, I have no idea what you are implementing so I
> cannot suggest a name for it.
>
> Since your code is going to be isolated, it would be easy to rename your
> classes during the review process.

+1 on that.

Regards
Henrik