Re: [RFC] translation back-ports

Amos Jeffries wrote:
> It's time I think to start making the older branches of Squid more
> compatible with the langpack translations.
>
> The plan is to immediately:
>
> - merge back the templates directory contents as if it was a new language.
> - make those templates the default hard-coded language files instead of
> English/* .
>

Done for 3.0.

The following still need some working out.

>
> Two further steps needing discussion:
>
> - removing the old translations bundled with those branches. quite
> outdated now.
>
> - best way to bundle the langpack with old branch releases. making
> squid code a single download bundle again while keeping the langpack
> updates a separate download built from 3-HEAD. Is it even worth it?
>
> - is it worth cross-porting the auto-negotiate feature to 2.7/2.8?
>
> It's definately not worth back-porting the translation toolkit pieces
> and .PO.
>

Amos

-- 
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE4 or 3.0.STABLE8