Re: Request for ntlm_auth helper name change in 3.1

From: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 09:23:22 +0200

On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:

> The users who have needed to use it recently pretty much overrule complete
> removal in 3.1.
>
> Does squid_smb_lm_auth cover everyones understanding of it?

sounds good to me

-- 
    /kinkie

Received on Sun Oct 05 2008 - 07:23:25 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Guido Serassio: "Re: Request for ntlm_auth helper name change in 3.1"
Previous message: Amos Jeffries: "3.1 BRANCH - any pending patches?"
In reply to: Amos Jeffries: "Re: Request for ntlm_auth helper name change in 3.1"
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Request for ntlm_auth helper name change in 3.1"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 05 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT