Re: Major memory leak in DeferredRead

From: Henrik Nordstrom <>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:50:17 +0100

ons 2009-02-11 klockan 19:06 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov:
> Is it possible that "indirectly lost" is not really lost?

Yes, as this is a trace at shutdown, and our module shutdown methods is
not very great.

Also not sure if this Squid was built with valgrind support or not. If
not then valgrind leak tracing gets very confused by the memory pools..

But in either case counts and amounts says a great deal.

Yes Amos, one block is one malloc in valgrind output.

Received on Thu Feb 12 2009 - 09:50:29 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 12 2009 - 12:00:04 MST