Re: benchmark results

From: Quin Guin <quinguin_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:11:15 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Kinkie, Just saw you reply. Here is the requested data: ============================================ Version 2.7.STABLE6 Quad-Core CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz RAM 8 GB HDD 3x SAS,Fujitsu,147Gb,15K OS RHEL4 AS U7 64bit – 2.6.9-78.0.13.ELsmp Users 57 RPS 166.95 Request Hit Ratio 51.7%, 51.3% CPU Usage: 7.18% CPU Usage, 5 minute avg: 4.33% CPU Usage, 60 minute avg: 3.97% ========================================== Version 2.6.STABLE21 Quad-Core CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz RAM 8 GB HDD 3x SATA,147Gb,7200K OS RHEL4 AS U6 64bit – 2.6.9-67.ELsmp Users 15 RPS 262.3 Request Hit Ratio 74.2%, 73.7% CPU Usage: 7.90% CPU Usage, 5 minute avg: 10.45% CPU Usage, 60 minute avg: 10.21% Quin ----- Original Message ---- From: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com> To: Quin Guin <quinguin_at_yahoo.com> Cc: squid-dev <squid-dev_at_squid-cache.org> Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2009 4:59:59 AM Subject: Re: benchmark results Would it be possible to have the average CPU load from the busiest systems? The simplest way is to use cachemgr via the command: squidclient -U <username> -W <cachemgr_passwd> mgr:info |grep 'CPU Usage' (obviously replacing <username> and <cachemgr_passwd> with the correct values) Thanks! Francesco On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Quin Guin <quinguin_at_yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Here are some benchmark results from 20 Squids they are not all in one cluster they are in 7 differnt data centers. They are all acting as forward proxies and I will be upgrading all 2.6 to 2.7 and some in case I will be able to use 3.0 where I don't need XFF. > > I will post the new benchmarks for the servers once I have updated them all. > > All of them are fairly close to the default squid config and are being LB by F5, netscaler or foundry. If you want to see a config for a certain unit please just let me know and if you have any questions please feel free to ask. I am open to trying out any config changes with in reasonable limits to see what the impact might be. > > All data was collected today Apr 3, 2009: > > Version 2.7.STABLE6 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2..50GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SAS,Fujitsu,147Gb,15K > OS RHEL4 AS U7 64bit – 2.6.9-78.0.13.ELsmp > Users 57 > RPS 162.31 > Request Hit Ratio 56.5%, 55.3% > > > Version 2.7.STABLE6 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SAS,Fujitsu,147Gb,15K > OS RHEL4 AS U7 64bit – 2.6.9-78.0.13.ELsmp > Users 57 > RPS 166.95 > Request Hit Ratio 51.7%, 51.3% > > > Version 2.6.STABLE22 > Single-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SATA,,500Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 ES U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 27 > RPS 168.68 > Request Hit Ratio 45.9%, 48.0% > > Version 2.7.STABLE6 > Single-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SATA,,500Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 ES U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 27 > RPS 175..33 > Request Hit Ratio 42.0%, 41.6% > > Version 2.6.STABLE22 > Single-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SATA,,500Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 ES U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 31 > RPS 171.32 > Request Hit Ratio 46.4%, 47.0% > > > Version 2.6.STABLE22 > Single-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SATA,,500Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 ES U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 31 > RPS 171.56 > Request Hit Ratio 46.3%, 47.1% > > Version 2.6..STABLE14 > Single-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SATA,,500Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 ES U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 37 > RPS 104.08 > Request Hit Ratio 61.0%, 61.1% > > Version 2.7.STABLE6 > Single-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SATA,,500Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 ES U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 28 > RPS 17.01 > Request Hit Ratio 41.8%, 42.2% > > Version 2.6.STABLE14 > Single-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SATA,,500Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 ES U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 36 > RPS 89.59 > Request Hit Ratio 60.9%, 61.5% > > Version 2.6.STABLE16 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5345 @ 2.33GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 2x SATA,147Gb,10K > OS RHEL4 ES U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 36 > RPS 83.57 > Request Hit Ratio 58.3%, 58..3% > > Version 2.6.STABLE14 > Single-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > RAM 4 GB > HDD Single SATA,165Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 ES U3 32bit – 2.6.9-34.ELsmp > Users 27 > RPS 24.57 > Request Hit Ratio 45.7%, 45.3% > > Version 2.6.STABLE16 > Single-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz > RAM 4 GB > HDD Single SATA,165Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 ES U3 32bit – 2.6.9-34.ELsmp > Users 27 > RPS 21.45 > Request Hit Ratio 52.1%, 52.6% > > Version 2.6.STABLE21 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SATA,147Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 AS U6 64bit – 2.6.9-67.ELsmp > Users 15 > RPS 262.3 > Request Hit Ratio 74.2%, 73.7% > > Version 2.6.STABLE21 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD 3x SATA,147Gb,7200K > OS RHEL4 AS U6 64bit – 2.6.9-67.ELsmp > Users 17 > RPS 173.39 > Request Hit Ratio 63.8%, 63.5% > > Version 2.7.STABLE5 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5310 @ 1.60GHz > RAM 4 GB > HDD SAS,Fujitsu,450Gb,10K > OS RHEL4 AS U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 37 > RPS 133.7 > Request Hit Ratio 55.8%, 55.6% > > Version 2.7.STABLE5 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5310 @ 1.60GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD SAS,450Gb,10K > OS RHEL4 AS U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 37 > RPS 136.14 > Request Hit Ratio 55.3%, 55.4% > > Version 2.7.STABLE5 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5320 @ 1.86GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD SAS,450Gb,10K > OS RHEL4 AS U4 64bit – 2.6..9-42.ELsmp > Users 37 > RPS 136.16 > Request Hit Ratio 54.6%, 55.3% > > Version 2.7.STABLE6 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5310 @ 1.60GHz > RAM 4 GB > HDD SAS,450Gb,10K > OS RHEL4 AS U6 64bit – 2.6.9-78.0.17.ELsmp > Users 35 > RPS 74.66 > Request Hit Ratio 56.5%, 55.9% > > Version 2..7.STABLE5 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5310 @ 1.60GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD SAS,450Gb,10K > OS RHEL4 AS U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 37 > RPS 136.14 > Request Hit Ratio 55.3%, 55.4% > > Version 2.7.STABLE5 > Quad-Core > CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5320 @ 1.86GHz > RAM 8 GB > HDD SAS,450Gb,10K > OS RHEL4 AS U4 32bit – 2.6.9-42.ELsmp > Users 34 > RPS 77.67 > Request Hit Ratio 57.7%, 56.2% > > > > > > > -- /kinkie
Received on Wed Apr 08 2009 - 12:24:52 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 09 2009 - 12:00:03 MDT