Re: [PATCH] Cache-Control overwriting hack

From: Robert Collins <robertc_at_squid-cache.org>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 12:12:04 +1000

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 11:57 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Yeah, but if I had a do-over, I'd make it simpler. This is *much*
> simpler...

I think you are entitled to that... but is it needed?

-Rob

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Received on Tue May 05 2009 - 02:14:44 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Nottingham: "Re: [PATCH] Cache-Control overwriting hack"
Previous message: Mark Nottingham: "Re: [PATCH] Cache-Control overwriting hack"
In reply to: Mark Nottingham: "Re: [PATCH] Cache-Control overwriting hack"
Next in thread: Mark Nottingham: "Re: [PATCH] Cache-Control overwriting hack"
Reply: Mark Nottingham: "Re: [PATCH] Cache-Control overwriting hack"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 05 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT