Re: disable-loadable-modules

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:40:14 +1200

Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Well, I've found a possible reason to disable them by default.
>
> The Debian Lenny/Ubuntu Jaunty libtool 2.2 appears broken with its
> handling of the libtool convenience library. Giving build failures
> unless they are configured to off.
>
> Since I made the change to testbed "distcheck" I've been fighting with
> them. Something inside distcheck seems to be running configure with the
> defaults regardless of what the master test is run with. Probably the
> dist "configure --silent" packaging or a sub-test of the package it makes.
>
> If anyone is able to help I'd be very grateful. If we can't find a
> solution to that one I think we are going to have to disable loadable
> modules unless adaptation needs them.
>
> Amos

Confirmed:

c_install_base=`CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd squid-3.HEAD-BZR/_inst
&& pwd | sed -e 's,^[^:\\/]:[\\/],/,'` \
           && dc_destdir="${TMPDIR-/tmp}/am-dc-$$/" \
           && cd squid-3.HEAD-BZR/_build \
           && ../configure --srcdir=.. --prefix="$dc_install_base" \
              \
           && make \
           && make dvi \
           && make check \
           && make install \
           && make installcheck \
           && make uninstall \
...
           && make dist \
           && rm -rf squid-3.HEAD-BZR.tar.gz squid-3.HEAD-BZR.tar.bz2 \
           && make distcleancheck
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
...
checking whether to use loadable modules... yes, implicitly

Fubar.

Amos
Received on Thu Jul 09 2009 - 07:40:25 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 10 2009 - 12:00:04 MDT