Not sure. Imho it's one of those small things that is very questionable
if it should have got an CVE # to start with.
For example RedHat downgraded the issue to low/low (lowest possible
rating) once explained what it really was about.
But we should probably notify CVE that the bug has been fixed.
tis 2009-10-13 klockan 11:14 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
> Are we going to acknowledge this vulnerability with a SQUID:2009-N alert?
> The reports seem to indicate it can be triggered remotely by servers.
>
> It was fixed during routine bug closures a while ago so we just need to
> wrap up an explanation and announce the fixed releases.
>
> Amos
Received on Mon Oct 12 2009 - 22:41:42 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 13 2009 - 12:00:06 MDT