Re: autoconf-refactor and netfilter-based transparent proxy

From: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 14:43:54 +0200

Hi all.

To avoid risking this to happen again, i'll do more frequent interim
merges while using trunk to baseline the output.

Any objections?

Thanks

On 5/10/10, Henrik Nordström <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
> mån 2010-05-10 klockan 18:13 +0200 skrev Kinkie:
>> >> revno: 10425
>> >> committer: Francesco Chemolli <kinkie_at_squid-cache.org>
>> >> branch nick: trunk
>> >> timestamp: Sun 2010-04-25 23:40:51 +0200
>> >> message:
>> >> Interim merge from autoconf-refactor feature-branch.
>> >
>> > Kinkie, could you please check that netfilter-based interception proxies
>> > are still supported?
>>
>> Will do ASAP (probably tomorrow).
>
> I have added back the missing define for LINUX_NETFILTER, but this is
> the second odd thing in the autoconf refactor merge. Can you please do a
> full review of your merge to see if there is anything else that's odd?
>
>> > It would also be nice to get rid of libcap and TPROXY warnings when the
>> > user wants just netfilter-based interception proxy support and is
>> > willing to --disable the rest. In Squid v3.1, we now get these
>> > irrelevant (for the said configuration) warnings:
>>
>> I'll check.
>
> trunk does not even have a configure option for controlling TPROXY. It's
> assumed to always be available by configure.in, and disabled in compiled
> code based on system header defines.
>
> Also the libcap warning message is a bit misguided. It's not only about
> TPROXY but also about security.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>

-- 
    /kinkie
Received on Fri May 21 2010 - 12:44:02 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 21 2010 - 12:00:10 MDT