Re: Bug 2957 - only-if-cached shouldn't count when we're not caching

From: Robert Collins <robertc_at_robertcollins.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:58:01 +1200

Well it sounds totally fine in principle; I'm wondering (without
reading the patch) how you define 'we are not caching' - just no
cachedirs ? That excludes mem-only caching (or perhaps thats not
supported now).

-Rob
Received on Thu Jun 17 2010 - 02:58:09 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Bug 2957 - only-if-cached shouldn't count when we're not caching"
Previous message: Mark Nottingham: "Bug 2957 - only-if-cached shouldn't count when we're not caching"
In reply to: Mark Nottingham: "Bug 2957 - only-if-cached shouldn't count when we're not caching"
Next in thread: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Bug 2957 - only-if-cached shouldn't count when we're not caching"
Reply: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Bug 2957 - only-if-cached shouldn't count when we're not caching"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 17 2010 - 12:00:07 MDT