lör 2010-06-26 klockan 14:24 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
> That is better. Although, in the ideal world, it is Squid2 that should
> be more specific and we could just use trunk for Squid3, Squid4, etc.
Don't think there will be a Squid-4 any time soon, but who knows.
For me Squid-2 is not a branch. It's a trunk (2.HEAD), just not as
active as the Squid-3 trunk.
But I see your point.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Sat Jun 26 2010 - 22:08:31 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 27 2010 - 12:00:10 MDT