Markus Moeller wrote:
> 
> "Amos Jeffries" <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote in message 
> news:4C5187D2.5010203_at_treenet.co.nz...
>> Markus Moeller wrote:
>>> Hi Amos,
> 
> Hi Amos
> 
>>>
>>>   How does your time look like now ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Markus
>>>
>>
>> Looks passable. I have not had time for a detailed view of the logics.
>> I'll commit this tomorrow with a name tweak, the naming scheme has 
>> been through the external acl helpers too now. I'll just tack ext_ on 
>> the front and _acl on the back of the existing binary name and update 
>> the docs to match.
>>
>> One thing that worries me still is the RUN_IFELSE autoconf macros 
>> still being added to configure.in. I'm sure there is a macro that 
>> checked for defined values of things inside headers without running 
>> stuff. If you can try and find that it would be great not to have to 
>> run anything on build.
>>
> 
> I have 4 RUN_IFELSE.
> 
> The first is to check to check that ldap works with the provided 
> libraries. Is that unusual ? Any other suggestion how to check ?
Um, okay. Thats reasonable on build. Duplicating at run-time may also be 
useful since the particular run-time libraries are not always the ones 
built against.
> The other three are to determine the LDAP vendor, which is a define 
> statement in one of the ldap header files and as it is a string in a 
> define I can not use any header grep nor proprocessor checks ( at least 
> I do not know of any).
Nasty. Oh well.
Okay. Have applied to Squid-3.HEAD with the extra ext_*_acl bits on the 
binary name and docs for the current naming style.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.6 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.1Received on Fri Aug 13 2010 - 10:30:20 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 13 2010 - 12:00:04 MDT